Summary

TikTok faces a U.S. shutdown by Jan. 19 unless the Supreme Court delays or blocks a law requiring its Chinese parent, ByteDance, to divest.

The Biden administration defends the law as a national security measure, citing potential risks of Chinese government influence. Content creators argue it violates free speech.

Donald Trump, once a supporter of the ban, seeks a delay to reach a “political resolution.”

A shutdown could cost TikTok millions of users and revenue. The court’s decision, due soon, could reshape U.S. digital speech policy.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      304 months ago

      Idk, I think all these governments having trade and tech wars is bad for our freedom. But on the other hand, TikTok is pure misinformation slop.

      • SatansMaggotyCumFart
        link
        fedilink
        94 months ago

        TikTok makes Facebook look like haute culture and maybe people don’t need as much freedom as they think they do.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          44 months ago

          maybe people don’t need as much freedom as they think they do.

          The quiet part is a bit loud here my blue conservative friend.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          94 months ago

          That’s not how freedom is defined in the constitution though. We are not in China or North Korea but are heading in that direction.

            • Eugene V. Debs' Ghost
              link
              fedilink
              English
              174 months ago

              I don’t think the government has the right to control what you do in your private time on your private device.

              1st amendment is right to free press and right to free speech. Several amendments imply a right to privacy from the government, such as the 3rd 4th and 9th.

              The government should not regulate how I make my speech. That’s ridiculous to give them the right to remove how people are allowed to speak.

              Good to know people are willing to give themselves more chains to a fascist Trump government if they don’t like the UI of an app.

              • SatansMaggotyCumFart
                link
                fedilink
                84 months ago

                There are already government regulations on what you can do on your ‘private’ device and what you can do on your private time.

                • Eugene V. Debs' Ghost
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  104 months ago

                  Cool, so why stop there! Just make it so they always have access to my phone! Why would I need the right to use anything I want?

                  The government now needs needs me to get court approval to speak my mind to Trump. Require paperwork just to develop an app.

                  Surely nothing bad will happen if we just let this pot of water rise with frogs advocating it to get hotter.

                  • SatansMaggotyCumFart
                    link
                    fedilink
                    34 months ago

                    I don’t think the government has the right to control what you do in your private time on your private device.

                    You’re still acting like they don’t do this already.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                English
                34 months ago

                I don’t think the government has the right to control what you do in your private time on your private device.

                [Laughs in War in Drugs.]

                  • @[email protected]
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    24 months ago

                    I agree, but that doesn’t change the fact that restricting what people can do in their own homes has been deemed constitutional under the interstate commerce clause art least since Wickard v. Filburn.

              • SatansMaggotyCumFart
                link
                fedilink
                24 months ago

                What is it, the sixty-ninth amendment?

                ‘An unregulated internet, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear apps, shall not be infringed’?

                • Eugene V. Debs' Ghost
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  24 months ago

                  This just in, nothing ever changes. Black people are still 3/5th of a person, women don’t have the right to vote, the vice president is 2nd place winner, and people don’t elect senators.