Pricefield | Lemmy
  • Communities
  • Create Post
  • Create Community
  • heart
    Support Lemmy
  • search
    Search
  • Login
  • Sign Up
@[email protected] to [email protected]English • 5 months ago

Was the whole TikTok drama a bait-and-switch to make Trump look good?

www.independent.co.uk

external-link
message-square
123
fedilink
  • cross-posted to:
  • [email protected]
544
external-link

Was the whole TikTok drama a bait-and-switch to make Trump look good?

www.independent.co.uk

@[email protected] to [email protected]English • 5 months ago
message-square
123
fedilink
  • cross-posted to:
  • [email protected]
Skeptics have highlighted how Trump was the one who initially called for the Chinese-owned social media app to be banned in 2020
  • Ulrich
    link
    fedilink
    English
    259•
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    I feel like this is an incredibly obvious yes. They were down for 12 hours. They put Trump’s name as their savior in the error message… Then the CEO shows up to his inauguration. Trump freely admits that it is because he believes TikTok helped him win the election:

    “I have a warm spot in my heart for TikTok because I won youth by 34 points,” Trump said in December. “And there are those that say TikTok had something to do with that.”

    So. Yeah. Of fucking course it was. Fuck national security and all that nonsense, ME ME ME!

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      101•5 months ago

      I was thinking the same, I’m 99% certain Trump required his name to be included in the welcome back message as a condition for not implementing the ban.

      It’s very poorly written theatre

      • MrPistachios
        link
        fedilink
        English
        5•5 months ago

        And a bribe

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        20•5 months ago

        The audience who enjoys this theater isn’t exactly sophisticated. Pro wrestling has more complex plot and believable characters.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      16•5 months ago

      And didn’t they explicitly state that they went down because “the US government is not working on a solution”, 12h before this government changed?

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        2•
        edit-2
        5 months ago

        Yes. https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/clyeer3qp12o

        It said that unless the government immediately stepped in to assure the video app it would not be punished for violating the looming ban, it would be “forced to go dark on January 19”.<<

      • Ulrich
        link
        fedilink
        English
        1•5 months ago

        No, as I said the error message explicitly mentioned him by name

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      26•5 months ago

      Also they’re now censoring anything anti Trump.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        4•5 months ago

        Do you have a source for that? I’ve heard about this, too, but the evidence was dubious at best

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          13•5 months ago

          https://www.newsweek.com/tiktok-blocking-anti-trump-content-what-we-know-2018190

          • Beej Jorgensen
            link
            fedilink
            English
            7•5 months ago

            “These reports have not been confirmed at this time,” the article notes.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              6•5 months ago

              https://www.tiktok.com/@morgon.forthepeople/video/7462086721652428078

              Looks like they may be coming from inside the house.

              • Ulrich
                link
                fedilink
                English
                3•5 months ago

                I can’t see this. Would you care to explain?

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  4•5 months ago

                  Some Tik Tok creators are complaining on the platform that they are being censored, specifically in regards to talking poorly about the Trump administration.

                  As much as some people harp on Tik Tok being a bastion of non-censorship, it has been proven repeatedly that this is not actually true. They just pick and choose carefully what to censor and when. Most platforms do that. It’s not surprising. It also wouldn’t be surprising for them to not promote or prioritize content with their algorithm that could be seen by the current POTUS as inflammatory because they are attempting to gain favor with him at the moment in exchange for potential political favors in regards to the platform in the future.

                  https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2019/sep/25/revealed-how-tiktok-censors-videos-that-do-not-please-beijing

                  • Ulrich
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    2•5 months ago

                    Thank you. I understand the situation, I was asking specifically about what “inside the house means” and what’s coming out of it?

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      2•
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      It did not make him look good to anyone with more than half of a brain.

      • Ulrich
        link
        fedilink
        English
        6•5 months ago

        Fortunately no one with half a brain voted for him anyway

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          1•5 months ago

          Truly all the more scary

[email protected]

[email protected]
Create a post
You are not logged in. However you can subscribe from another Fediverse account, for example Lemmy or Mastodon. To do this, paste the following into the search field of your instance: [email protected]

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


  • @[email protected]
  • @[email protected]
  • @[email protected]
  • @[email protected]
  • 1 user / day
  • 4 users / week
  • 4.36K users / month
  • 13K users / 6 months
  • 5 subscribers
  • 16K Posts
  • 659K Comments
  • Modlog
  • mods:
  • @[email protected]
  • enu
  • Technopagan
  • L4sBot
  • L3s
  • @[email protected]
  • UI: 0.18.4
  • BE: 0.18.2
  • Modlog
  • Instances
  • Docs
  • Code
  • join-lemmy.org