“Replacing signs because of behaviour like this is not a good use of taxpayers’ money.”
Maybe it’s because I’m a relic of a more casual era, and went to a uni that constantly had a Pus Formation kiosk, but I don’t get why they keep throwing entire signs away. Just patch the vandal’s work until you catch the vandal.
Yeah I remember living on Cock St for a while. Quite a while actually. But that was a bit of tape. It’s not really clear from this article exactly how this vandalism is being done.
Maybe it’s because I’m a relic of a more casual era, and went to a uni that constantly had a Pus Formation kiosk, but I don’t get why they keep throwing entire signs away. Just patch the vandal’s work until you catch the vandal.
Patch it how?
I’m not entirely sure, perhaps it’s just cheaper to change the sign than spend too much time fixing it?
Maybe. I think it may be an example of the perfect is (fiscally) the enemy of the “she’ll be right”.
Yeah I remember living on Cock St for a while. Quite a while actually. But that was a bit of tape. It’s not really clear from this article exactly how this vandalism is being done.
I think anyone living on or near a Canal Street/Drive/Road/Wharf/etc know the value of someone with a bit of tape or a coin and some time to kill.
Brilliant patch war.
Jump to 0:14 to skip the initial slides.
It’s been a while since I saw that one, absolutely brilliant.
Thanks, I love that!!