• zifnab25 [he/him, any]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    242 years ago

    Natalie should know better. But also… the really nasty shit under Obama was heavily under-reported and only ever seemed to penetrate media in a select few circuits. Casually tossing off a “What even did Obama do that was so bad?” is almost forgivable if you’re not a terminally online 30-year-old who makes hour long YouTube videos about politics, history, and culture.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      32 years ago

      For me, it’s someone that savvy casually dropping a “both sides” comment. If I didn’t know better I’d assume it was bait. Its hard to imagine that level of cluelessness.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      112 years ago

      Am I reading this wrong? I assume Natalie is making a joke about how people under report Obama’s nasty shits

      • zifnab25 [he/him, any]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        82 years ago

        I think she’s joking about how people over-report his trivial shit. But it can be read as blithely ignoring the monstrous crimes Obama did commit while in office, because it echoes a lot of the liberal apologia of the administration that amounted to “The worst thing Obama ever did was wear a tan suit”.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          22 years ago

          While I don’t think she has talked about Obama’s war crimes or things adjacent to it, I find it hard to believe that she would be saying that seriously especially the both sides part. Tho her response to the criticism doesn’t make it better.

      • tuga [he/him]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        42 years ago

        You’re reading it wrong, she’s stating you can’t make a moral equivalence between Obama and, say, Trump or something because supposedly the worst things obama did were silly.