I don’t know if I’m opening a can of worms here, and I’m still trying to backtrack a lot of history where I was tuning everything out. I keep seeing random swipes at Signal (or the representatives (?)), and I was wondering whether they are founded or just lies.Is it another situation like Lemmy where we just “take the technology and move on”? Thanks!

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    945 months ago

    Different people don’t like it for different reasons. Some people don’t like it because they think it has CIA financial backing (nope), and some people don’t like it because it requires your phone number, therefore it is not private (the privacy it provides is more than sufficient for anyone not actively being persecuted by a Five Eyes state), and some people don’t like it because it feels corporate (it’s a 501c3 nonprofit, and how corporate it feels is subjective).

    • Em Adespoton
      link
      fedilink
      615 months ago

      And some people don’t like it because it used to handle SMS on Android, and they removed that feature for security reasons.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          55 months ago

          It was very unpopular with my girlfriend, who I had just gotten into using Signal a few months prior.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          265 months ago

          Handling SMS and handling secure/encrypted messages could’ve made people think they communicate securely while relying on text messages instead.
          Not handling SMS fixes this source of confusion and I applaud their decision.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            85 months ago

            I think the number of people who care deeply about privacy and cannot tell the difference between an sms or signal message is minimal. There were plenty of ways signal could have highlighted DANGER UNSECURE CHANNEL if they had wanted to, or made it an off-by-default option, rather than drop SMS entirely. For myself and many other people it meant that family members dropped Signal rather than have an extra messaging app, and so I’m still stuck with WhatsApp on my phone…

          • Brad
            link
            fedilink
            25 months ago

            There were ways to make it clear that it was insecure that didn’t alienate an arguable majority of their casual userbase.

          • guy
            link
            fedilink
            English
            55 months ago

            If only the was some indicator for unsecure messages, such as a grey send button and an open padlock. 🙄

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              25 months ago

              And you seriously think most people would look at and act on such an icon instead of just ignoring it?

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                2
                edit-2
                5 months ago

                Or just accept that not everyone will be having a secure conversation every time at first, but more will be secured as more and more people like me convince our family members to use it and eventually we transition everyone away from SMS?

                No, of course not, why would we build a critical mass of users like that?

                Since they removed SMS support almost my entire family and my friends uninstalled signal, except a few who keep it to talk to me, and my half dozen friends privacy-conscious enough to care. Dozens of people, down to eight if you don’t count me, in my circles alone. Objectively, removing SMS support harmed Signal’s popularity and made everyone less secure. The argument for why they did it was at best myopic and also, in my opinion, utter bullshit.

          • AFK BRB Chocolate
            link
            fedilink
            English
            165 months ago

            The problem is that most people don’t want multiple text apps, they just want one. I had gotten a number of people using signal, and it was secure when we talked, but when signal dropped SMS, almost every one of them stopped using it, so then none of their conversations were secure.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              25 months ago

              Yeah, the never-ending weighting between convenience and security.
              But are you going to tell me that those people don’t have Whatsapp, Threema, Telegram or any other IM installed and just use plain SMS instead?

      • guy
        link
        fedilink
        English
        55 months ago

        This was such a dumb decision

    • AtHeartEngineer
      link
      fedilink
      English
      25 months ago

      Accurate. And if you are being targeted by 5 eyes, your phone is probably fucked, one app vs another probably won’t make a difference

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      25 months ago

      I understand why, but I get annoyed that I can’t integrate it into ferdium with my other things like discord, e-mail and calendar.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      75 months ago

      Some people don’t like that they attached a crypto wallet to the app. I couldn’t care less and use the messenger daily!

      • guy
        link
        fedilink
        English
        25 months ago

        I don’t care or use it either, but I haven’t seen a single use case for that wallet nor mobilecoins. Does people actually use it and for what?

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          15 months ago

          My friend sent me some MOB coins mainly because he could attach messages with the transactions. So no idea what it’s really used for

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      5
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      I don’t think I’ve ever seen people say it has CIA financial backing. It did however until only a couple of years ago have strong ties to the State Department’s Open Tech Fund (from the same financial envelope that brings you RFA/RFE/VOA).

      • Snot Flickerman
        link
        fedilink
        English
        225 months ago

        The main developer of Lemmy seems to think there’s a solid connection. I’m not jumping in that fight, I got no dog in that fight, I don’t have that kind of threat model.

        https://dessalines.github.io/essays/why_not_signal.html#cia-funding

        However, considering he’s openly Marxist, he may be just slightly biased.

        I suspect OP of this post actually saw the recent /c/Privacy thread over at lemmy.ml where Dessalines was proselytizing against Signal while not seeming to have a problem with SimpleX chat being funded by a group of Venture Capital investors, including Jack Dorsey.

        • sunzu2
          link
          fedilink
          25 months ago

          I think he also avoid criticizing tele which is even more swiss cheese than signal

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          175 months ago

          Openly Marxist is just the start of it. Dude is utterly unhinged, so his theories don’t mean a lot to me unless they’re backed by evidence.