• Drusas
        link
        fedilink
        173 months ago

        Both can be true. But only if you have enough people in either case.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        83 months ago

        If you want for the police to get an excuse to mow you down with a tank that is. They so wish some of you have guns so they can kill you and have a ready and ironclad excuse

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            12 months ago

            One agent in a crowd of unarmed people will not cause that effect. But if everyone is on edge and carrying a gun, then yes, one will be enough to cause full blown massacre.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              12 months ago

              One agent in a crowd of unarmed people will not cause that effect.

              It will if police are present and are looking for an excuse to violently quash protest.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                12 months ago

                I just want you to recognise the difference between “police mows down a crowd of unarmed protesters” and “police crushed armed insurrection in an intense shootout”.

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  2
                  edit-2
                  2 months ago

                  It just takes one provocateur to make that difference. The number of actual firearms at the protest doesn’t matter as long as there’s one, which the provocateur can bring.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          103 months ago

          It’s not like they’re above shooting unarmed protestors. Just compare how cops dealt with cop city with the Bundy occupation.