@[email protected] to Programmer [email protected] • 3 months agounsafeCodelemmy.mlimagemessage-square13fedilinkarrow-up1245cross-posted to: [email protected]
arrow-up1245imageunsafeCodelemmy.ml@[email protected] to Programmer [email protected] • 3 months agomessage-square13fedilinkcross-posted to: [email protected]
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink27•3 months agoNot needed, main in C++ implicitly returns 0 if there is no return
minus-squareLucy :3linkfedilink10•3 months agoShould ≠ Needs to You can do it, and it will work, but it’s unclean and not best-practice. I wouldn’t be surprised if it’s undefined behaviour.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink22•3 months agoJust to clarify. It is defined behavior - there’s plenty of undefined behavior in C but that ain’t one of them.
Not needed, main in C++ implicitly returns 0 if there is no return
Should ≠ Needs to
You can do it, and it will work, but it’s unclean and not best-practice. I wouldn’t be surprised if it’s undefined behaviour.
Just to clarify. It is defined behavior - there’s plenty of undefined behavior in C but that ain’t one of them.