@[email protected]M to Science [email protected]English • 2 months agoAt this rate, why not.mander.xyzimagemessage-square89fedilinkarrow-up1352
arrow-up1352imageAt this rate, why not.mander.xyz@[email protected]M to Science [email protected]English • 2 months agomessage-square89fedilink
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish21•2 months agoThanks for the link, interesting read! I know that a good paper is succint, but honestly, I thought that making the case for a gigaton-yield nuclear explosion to combat climate change would take more than four pages…
Thanks for the link, interesting read! I know that a good paper is succint, but honestly, I thought that making the case for a gigaton-yield nuclear explosion to combat climate change would take more than four pages…
Study conclusion: YOLO