• Droechai
      link
      fedilink
      55 months ago

      You save quite a lot of time when working on a database if it’s stored in RAM compared to tape, so it does make sense to use that technology

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            15 months ago

            My use case is primarily real time data capture - raw log is written to disk and can be recovered from, although at that point we’d have fallen back on the secondary as primary would now be suspect.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            15 months ago

            At which point you have to slurp down a few hundred terabytes from the other datacenters when the power turns back on.

            This is why Google datacenter managers hesitate to turn off the power even when an employee is in the process of getting electrocuted.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                English
                35 months ago

                Sadly I cannot, since the source is an ex-Googler I know in person who was there personally. While I fully believe the story, I’m just some rando on the Internet, so you’re welcome to take it with the appropriate pile of salt.

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  15 months ago

                  Thank you for the honesty, I do believe you fwiw, it’s in line with general business practices

          • Mose13
            link
            fedilink
            95 months ago

            Then you lose your database quickly, so it’s still fast

            • Phunter
              link
              fedilink
              English
              25 months ago

              Your delete is O(1)? Ha! Our delete operation runs in O(0).