see this is the kinda shit i don’t understand, what do they gain from this? It’s like banning umbrellas, are they literally just trying to optimize suffering and deaths?
No, they’re trying to optimize profits. News outlets will still be expected to do weather reports. Tons of jobs will still require weather data. This way, they can sell access to that data through private firms like AccuWeather.
see this is the kinda shit i don’t understand, what do they gain from this? It’s like banning umbrellas, are they literally just trying to optimize suffering and deaths?
It’s business.
Less govt infrastructure and more money paid to private organisations.
Every job cut from government offices is a job created in a private firm.
No, they’re trying to optimize profits. News outlets will still be expected to do weather reports. Tons of jobs will still require weather data. This way, they can sell access to that data through private firms like AccuWeather.
How do you deny human climate change when the data is unequivocal?
Get rid of the data of course.
We wouldn’t have so many COVID cases if we stopped testing.
Trump is mad at NOAA for reporting a reality that contradicts his delusions:
https://www.aol.com/news/trump-nominates-sharpiegate-scientist-lead-193834394.html
Truth is anathema to those who profit from misinformation.