It’s part of the tolerance fallacy. If someone is intolerant of someone for just existing, you cannot tolerate those intolerant people or they will run rampant. Whether they don’t want Jewish people to exist, trans people, gay people, or any other group to exist, you cannot tolerate them, or it will just spread.
Edit: the alternative solution is through education and integration which helps the people learn they aren’t so different and they learn to tolerate each other until everything is forgotten eventually. Some might call that DEI
On any Lemmy instance I would expect admins to axe threads/boards that made specific calls to harm specific people. You cannot advocate targeted violence in many countries
Are you suggesting instance owners should get involved in criminal activity to see what happens?
Did you forget Kim Dotcom was arrested in NZ by the US FBI for violations of US laws? The jurisdiction for the laws of the USA are not limited to the borders of the USA.
If said instance gets the attention of the FBI or USSS for calls to violence I susoect they’ll he investigated.
Im a bootlicker because I recognize the legal risks associated with hosting calls to targeted violence? Do you not see how clownish that response you had is?
I was permanently banned from reddit for “threatening violence against places” when I made a sarcastic comment about someone else’s plan to fix the housing crisis by destroying housing as it was being constructed.
I can’t believe these people who are openly calling for mass murder aren’t being banned. My reddit account had zero problems for twelve years and then I was banned over that one comment, for a rule that doesn’t exist (they told me I’d broken the rule against “violence against places”, but no such rule exists).
removed by mod
I really don’t want to watch a YouTube video, but I do want to call for violence.
Violence is often the correct answer
I’ve got an ever-growing list of comments here on lemmy where leftists call for violence against their opponents.
It’s part of the tolerance fallacy. If someone is intolerant of someone for just existing, you cannot tolerate those intolerant people or they will run rampant. Whether they don’t want Jewish people to exist, trans people, gay people, or any other group to exist, you cannot tolerate them, or it will just spread.
Edit: the alternative solution is through education and integration which helps the people learn they aren’t so different and they learn to tolerate each other until everything is forgotten eventually. Some might call that DEI
But platforms cannot host and spread demands for violence without being an accessory to the crimes advocated.
You want a witch hunt. But you’re not getting it.
A witch hunt is a hunt for something that isn’t real. Who is it you believe that isn’t real?
the NaZis
Imagine unironically relying on the cockroaches and dead rats guy
On any Lemmy instance I would expect admins to axe threads/boards that made specific calls to harm specific people. You cannot advocate targeted violence in many countries
You can’t do a lot of stuff in many countries, yet when it’s any kind of social consciousness we actually suddenly do something about it
Meanwhile I can find sites on how to kidnap and rape children with less than 5m of seaeching
and those sites dont have addresses in NYC where you can easily arrest the owners/executives
Neither does any Lemmy instance I’m aware of
So that’s good
Are you suggesting instance owners should get involved in criminal activity to see what happens?
Did you forget Kim Dotcom was arrested in NZ by the US FBI for violations of US laws? The jurisdiction for the laws of the USA are not limited to the borders of the USA.
Nothing, that’s what’ll happen
Do you think what he did is anything like a Lemmy instance?
Keep licking that boot, it’s a good look for you .world people
If said instance gets the attention of the FBI or USSS for calls to violence I susoect they’ll he investigated.
Im a bootlicker because I recognize the legal risks associated with hosting calls to targeted violence? Do you not see how clownish that response you had is?
Imagine not having a counterargument to the cockroach guy…
Imagine thinking people would make serious counterarguments to the cockroach guy…
Imagine having no counterargument because cockroach guy is being right, and then dismissing him because it doesn’t fit your world view
Imagine thinking the cockroach guy is right…
Imagine listening to arguments
Imagine understanding arguments at all
Overthrowing the government is illegal
I was permanently banned from reddit for “threatening violence against places” when I made a sarcastic comment about someone else’s plan to fix the housing crisis by destroying housing as it was being constructed.
I can’t believe these people who are openly calling for mass murder aren’t being banned. My reddit account had zero problems for twelve years and then I was banned over that one comment, for a rule that doesn’t exist (they told me I’d broken the rule against “violence against places”, but no such rule exists).
The obvious bias over there pisses me off.
This place isn’t any better. Post you were answering to, got removed xD