Yeah, I guess it was the other shooter that was captured on camera at the exact same time with the same evidence. And the shell casings. And the fingerprints. But yeah, jump on the neck beard bandwagon. I’m sure it was just a coincidence that he was carrying the gun which matches the shell casings?
Everyone charged with a penal offence has the right to be presumed innocent until proved guilty according to law in a public trial at which he has had all the guarantees necessary for his defence.
Money can’t buy exoneration when you are on camera and leave DNA evidence.
By assuming he is guilty you are robbing him of his right to presumption of innocence.
There’s no presumption, it’s on video.
You are presuming that is him in the video. Are you well?
Yeah, I guess it was the other shooter that was captured on camera at the exact same time with the same evidence. And the shell casings. And the fingerprints. But yeah, jump on the neck beard bandwagon. I’m sure it was just a coincidence that he was carrying the gun which matches the shell casings?
Presumption of innocence as a concept goes back to at least the 6th century and is part of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights.
Agree yet the mountain of evidence is overwhelming.
shhhh…
kikutwo is a documented troll account.
block them and let them be pathetic alone.
Can’t wait for you to wring hands when this piece of trash gets life in prison.