That the wellbeing of the majority should be more important than the wealth of a few. And that the situation is currently so skewed that it’s not surprising people are rising up against it.
He didn’t really remove any wealth, though. If anything wealth concentration increased because there is 1 less wealthy but the wealth remains. That’s like thinking the ending of Squid Game season 1 was happy.
Jury nullification would send a very powerful message .
Also the law doesn’t matter anymore anyway, so nobody should vote to convict because they’re concerned about the rule of law.
Whats the message?
That the wellbeing of the majority should be more important than the wealth of a few. And that the situation is currently so skewed that it’s not surprising people are rising up against it.
He didn’t really remove any wealth, though. If anything wealth concentration increased because there is 1 less wealthy but the wealth remains. That’s like thinking the ending of Squid Game season 1 was happy.
Maybe that sometimes roping in illegitimate behaviour requires illegal measures, if legal measures aren’t working?
What message did you receive?
How much longer until the roping in begins?
Delay, deny? Depose.
Alright but as far as actionable philosophy what does that do for you?
Delay, Dissent, Depose?