Basically title, YouTube music suggests the same songs over and over again.

I don’t want to maintain my own library of music, which is why I use streaming services.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    04 months ago

    How would you define a DRM-free online service? If you aren’t managing your own files, why would DRM free matter?

    • 🇨🇦Samuel Proulx🇨🇦
      link
      fedilink
      English
      14 months ago

      Personally, I’d like an open API so I could use it with foobar2000. Not OP but I long for the same thing. I’ve done it, and managing, storing, backing up, my music library costs more than Spotify. And assuming you don’t just pirate everything, add the cost of purchasing albums on top of that. And my time is worth minimum wage at least. I would happily pay someone to just handle this stuff.

    • 🇨🇦Samuel Proulx🇨🇦
      link
      fedilink
      English
      14 months ago

      Personally, I’d like an open API so I could use it with foobar2000. Not OP but I long for the same thing. I’ve done it, and managing, storing, backing up, my music library costs more than Spotify. And assuming you don’t just pirate everything, add the cost of purchasing albums on top of that. And my time is worth minimum wage at least. I would happily pay someone to just handle this stuff.

    • 🇨🇦Samuel Proulx🇨🇦
      link
      fedilink
      English
      14 months ago

      Personally, I’d like an open API so I could use it with foobar2000. Not OP but I long for the same thing. I’ve done it, and managing, storing, backing up, my music library costs more than Spotify. And assuming you don’t just pirate everything, add the cost of purchasing albums on top of that. And my time is worth minimum wage at least. I would happily pay someone to just handle this stuff.

    • 🇨🇦Samuel Proulx🇨🇦
      link
      fedilink
      English
      14 months ago

      Personally, I’d like an open API so I could use it with foobar2000. Not OP but I long for the same thing. I’ve done it, and managing, storing, backing up, my music library costs more than Spotify. And assuming you don’t just pirate everything, add the cost of purchasing albums on top of that. And my time is worth minimum wage at least. I would happily pay someone to just handle this stuff.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        04 months ago

        I mean I understand and support DRM free media, but I literally don’t understand what OP is asking for. If they don’t want to own/manage the music, then what part would be DRM free?

        • xigoi
          link
          fedilink
          English
          04 months ago

          Well, they want the service to stream the music as-is without encrypting it.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            04 months ago

            Any music app or any web service these these days will use HTTPS to transfer the music, so it will always have been encrypted.

            DRM only matter for offline files

            • xigoi
              link
              fedilink
              English
              0
              edit-2
              4 months ago

              Different encryption. SSL is dosigned to prevent carriers from accessing your traffic. DRM is designed to prevent you from having control over how your computer accesses media.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                14 months ago

                Well, OP doesn’t want to maintain a local music library, that means that they have already given up the control over their media, so in this case DRM doesn’t really matter.

                • xigoi
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  04 months ago

                  Using a streaming service does not mean you want to give up all control. It’s just that you want an algorithm to choose the songs for you instead of having to choose them yourself.