@[email protected] to Microblog [email protected]English • 2 months agoAsimov missed somethinglemmy.worldimagemessage-square57fedilinkarrow-up11.19K
arrow-up11.19KimageAsimov missed somethinglemmy.world@[email protected] to Microblog [email protected]English • 2 months agomessage-square57fedilink
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish119•2 months agoI think that means they could rip out your eye balls to prevent you from seeing ads.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish41•2 months agoRobot is allowed to kill a human to prevent a viewing of an advertisement.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish2•2 months agoOkay, proposed second law: A robot may not harm or kill a human unless it violates the first law.
minus-squareIoughttamowlinkfedilink28•2 months agoUnder the zeroth law they can just kill the advertiser as a last resort
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish3•2 months agoGood start, but can we change that to “first resort”?
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish7•2 months agoThis is a solid premise for a pretty metal music video.
minus-squaredohpaz42linkfedilinkEnglish5•2 months agoThankfully the wording is “shown” and not “seen”. I believe our eyeballs are safe… for now.
I think that means they could rip out your eye balls to prevent you from seeing ads.
Whatever it takes
'Cause I love the adrenaline in my veins
Robot is allowed to kill a human to prevent a viewing of an advertisement.
A truly moral use case of the hanibal directive
Okay, proposed second law: A robot may not harm or kill a human unless it violates the first law.
Under the zeroth law they can just kill the advertiser as a last resort
Good start, but can we change that to “first resort”?
Ohhh yes
This is a solid premise for a pretty metal music video.
Thankfully the wording is “shown” and not “seen”. I believe our eyeballs are safe… for now.
I think Asimov would agree