Summary

Despite the 22nd Amendment barring a third term (“No person shall be elected to the office of the President more than twice”), Trump continues to suggest he could run again, raising the idea at a Black History Month event and with Republican governors.

Legal experts say the Constitution is clear that he cannot run, though some supporters, including Rep. Andy Ogles and Steve Bannon, are pushing for a constitutional amendment or a 2028 campaign.

Meanwhile, Trump has expanded executive authority in his second term, drawing criticism for undermining congressional checks.

  • Nougat
    link
    fedilink
    64 months ago

    Being a convicted felon does not disqualify you from running for president, or from being elected to the office.

    Fomenting insurrection does, but that got waved away “because reasons”.

    • ORbituary
      link
      fedilink
      English
      6
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      Because Merrick Garland is a bitch. Also more stuff.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        34 months ago

        Because Biden appointed a bitch instead of someone who would actually do their goddamn job.

      • Nougat
        link
        fedilink
        54 months ago

        Nah, Colorado was handling it appropriately, then SCOTUS stepped in and told a state that they’re not allowed to administer elections in their state.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            2
            edit-2
            4 months ago

            Because given how shameless SCOTUS has been, not sure there’s even an alternative reality where they still don’t worm themselves around Garland too, regardless of what he did or how fast.

    • RejZoR
      link
      fedilink
      English
      34 months ago

      As convicted felon you can’t run for position of burger flipper at McDonalds, but you can become a president…

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        24 months ago

        I mean the reason why someone shouldn’t be barred for office based on a conviction is obvious

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          04 months ago

          I mean, it should be fine to stop someone from running a country if they are a felon, but that requires sane, rational adults.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            14 months ago

            No. It should never be fine. People make mistakes. People fix those mistakes. But more importantly, you never want it possible for a political arrest to disbar a person from office.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              1
              edit-2
              4 months ago

              Problem is he wasn’t just arrested. Convicted by a jury, incited an insurrection on live TV, retained classified documents and hid them from the FBI, and attempted a coup with the fake electors scheme…it’s a massive leap beyond just being “arrested”.

              He’s literally guilty of blatant treason. That should obviously be disqualifying. Brazil, which might be considered a “third world country” by many Americans, handled their similar situation infinitely better.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          14 months ago

          And if you, and potentially multiple family members, don’t pass a background check… you still qualify!