@[email protected] to Lemmy [email protected]English • 2 months agoFacepalm on multiple levelslemmy.mlimagemessage-square5fedilinkarrow-up18cross-posted to: [email protected][email protected]
arrow-up18imageFacepalm on multiple levelslemmy.ml@[email protected] to Lemmy [email protected]English • 2 months agomessage-square5fedilinkcross-posted to: [email protected][email protected]
minus-square@[email protected]OPlinkfedilinkEnglish0•2 months agoI think you are bold to assume their plan involved repealing vs ignoring.
minus-squareCyrus DraegurlinkfedilinkEnglish1•2 months agoExactly. “they can’t do that that’s illegal” Who’s gonna stop them? The law ain’t doing Jack FUCKING Shit. If there is no group or individual who is both willing and able to inflict consequences, THERE ARE NO CONSEQUENCES
I think you are bold to assume their plan involved repealing vs ignoring.
Exactly.
“they can’t do that that’s illegal”
Who’s gonna stop them? The law ain’t doing Jack FUCKING Shit. If there is no group or individual who is both willing and able to inflict consequences, THERE ARE NO CONSEQUENCES