@[email protected]M to Science [email protected]English • edit-23 months agofuck thismander.xyzimagemessage-square684fedilinkarrow-up12.14K
arrow-up12.14Kimagefuck thismander.xyz@[email protected]M to Science [email protected]English • edit-23 months agomessage-square684fedilink
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish20•3 months agoThe constitution also didn’t say “the president shall give a shit about the law” Rookie mistake, IMO
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish2•edit-23 months agoIt was the first time they were writing a constitution. Obviously they were rookies
minus-squareCethinlinkfedilinkEnglish6•edit-23 months agoSecond. The Articles of Confederation was first and failed.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish7•3 months agoIt literally did, minus your contemporary idiom: he shall take Care that the Laws be faithfully executed, (It’s called the “take care clause” and is part of Article II, Section 3, in case anybody wants to look it up.) Not that it matters anymore, after Trump v. United States.
The constitution also didn’t say “the president shall give a shit about the law”
Rookie mistake, IMO
It was the first time they were writing a constitution. Obviously they were rookies
Second. The Articles of Confederation was first and failed.
It literally did, minus your contemporary idiom:
(It’s called the “take care clause” and is part of Article II, Section 3, in case anybody wants to look it up.)
Not that it matters anymore, after Trump v. United States.