Are you fucking kidding me…

    • smeg
      link
      fedilink
      English
      81 month ago

      Term limits are an antidemocratic solution to an antidemocratic problem - the problem isn’t incumbent people, which the voters select, it’s incumbent corporate interests, which the voters don’t select.

      Term limits for the legislature would create a revolving door of corporate shills. It takes a couple terms for a legislator to become skilled at the process and learn to make progress on their agenda - and to build a backbone to their donors.

      Ultimately, everything people think would be solved by term limits would actually be solved by eliminating money from politics. We need to greatly diminish the incumbency advantage, which is fueled by money in politics, to give us legislators who have to be accountable to the voters instead of donors.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        01 month ago

        This is an interesting point. Would revoking citizens united solve this the same way?

        I still think term limits could help get new perspectives into politics.

        • smeg
          link
          fedilink
          English
          11 month ago

          I think it would at least return us to how it was before Citizens United, with some amount of constraint on political donations. But I think more is needed to reach the intended effect.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      11 month ago

      10 DEM join GOP will not be enough to give President Trump a third term, but that may change given how things are going on right now.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      31 month ago

      California has had term limits for state office for over a decade now. It hasn’t helped at all. It just gives more power to party bureaucrats and the civil servants at the expense of the electorate. Like almost every other quick fix, it’s worthless.