@[email protected]M to Science [email protected]English • 3 months agoDunning-Krugerlemmy.dbzer0.comimagemessage-square261fedilinkarrow-up11.76K
arrow-up11.76KimageDunning-Krugerlemmy.dbzer0.com@[email protected]M to Science [email protected]English • 3 months agomessage-square261fedilink
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish8•3 months agoYeah, both sides are wrong here. Dunning-Kruger is bad, but so is credentialism and appeal to authority.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish14•3 months agoNeil deGrasse Tyson and literally anything other than astrophysics
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish4•3 months agoEven Noble Prize winners are surprisingly often affected by this -> wikipedia:Noble disease
deleted by creator
I guees it needs (relevant) inserted?
deleted by creator
Yeah, both sides are wrong here.
Dunning-Kruger is bad, but so is credentialism and appeal to authority.
Neil deGrasse Tyson and literally anything other than astrophysics
And sometimes also astrophysics
Even Noble Prize winners are surprisingly often affected by this -> wikipedia:Noble disease