@[email protected]M to Science [email protected]English • 3 months agoDunning-Krugerlemmy.dbzer0.comimagemessage-square261fedilinkarrow-up11.76K
arrow-up11.76KimageDunning-Krugerlemmy.dbzer0.com@[email protected]M to Science [email protected]English • 3 months agomessage-square261fedilink
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish24•3 months agoYou can even be incorrect on a subject you have expertise in.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish10•3 months agoExperts often disagree. If it were that easy, everything would be solved. We wouldn’t need so much research or so many universities.
minus-squarebountygiver [any]linkfedilinkEnglish12•3 months agothat’s why we have peer reviews for new findings by experts.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish6•3 months agoExactly, imagine if we threw away the entire peer review process and made it about, “Well I have a PhD! Checkmate.” We’d descend into a dark age for science.
You can even be incorrect on a subject you have expertise in.
Experts often disagree.
If it were that easy, everything would be solved. We wouldn’t need so much research or so many universities.
that’s why we have peer reviews for new findings by experts.
Exactly, imagine if we threw away the entire peer review process and made it about, “Well I have a PhD! Checkmate.”
We’d descend into a dark age for science.