@[email protected]M to Science [email protected]English • 2 months agoLeast extreme biophysics phdlemmy.dbzer0.comimagemessage-square241fedilinkarrow-up11.53K
arrow-up11.53KimageLeast extreme biophysics phdlemmy.dbzer0.com@[email protected]M to Science [email protected]English • 2 months agomessage-square241fedilink
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish11•2 months agoWasn’t he the guy who was trying to find a way for HIV-positive couples to have HIV-negative babies?
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish12•2 months agoAntiretroviral therapy for pregnant women already is a safe and effective way to avoid HIV transmission to the baby. It’s part of standard treatment guidelines https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1701216324003748 So the guy has genetically engineered babies as a potentially risky and certainlycontroversial solution for a problem that already has a safe and non-controversia solution.
Wasn’t he the guy who was trying to find a way for HIV-positive couples to have HIV-negative babies?
Antiretroviral therapy for pregnant women already is a safe and effective way to avoid HIV transmission to the baby. It’s part of standard treatment guidelines https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1701216324003748
So the guy has genetically engineered babies as a potentially risky and certainlycontroversial solution for a problem that already has a safe and non-controversia solution.