• Riddick3001
    link
    fedilink
    English
    27
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    And Merz and Scholz got their 2/3 majorities via concession of 100 B for environmental measures for the Greens.

    DW called it humorously, " a Defence Package with a Green Stamp".

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      12
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      It is not „for the greens“ it is for Germany. The environment does not have any political interest.

      • Riddick3001
        link
        fedilink
        English
        4
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        DW : " Despite a huge setback in Germany’s federal election, the Green Party has secured a victory to the tune of billions of euros. The future governing coalition needed the Greens to realize a key political goal.

      • Riddick3001
        link
        fedilink
        English
        11 month ago

        The Greens had a strong position in the negotiations. To me it seems they got a good deal.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        71 month ago

        For 4 years.

        The next government will be beholden to the debt brake again - and if the CDU happens to be in the opposition, they will block any and all investment to make the governing parties look worse.

        Although I expect the AfD to form a blocking minority for constitutional amendments anyway. Maybe we’ll get the first CDU + AfD government by 2029 - wouldn’t be the first time that German conservatives allow nazis to rise to power.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          31 month ago

          Why would this only last 4 years? It’s a constitution change. It does not magically undo itself after a certain time.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            21 month ago

            The budget, I mean.

            In four years, I suspect nearly all money will be allocated and either the next government manages to make another constitutional amendment or they will lack founding again.

            500 billion is not a lot for 30 years of infrastructure decay.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              21 month ago

              Yes but the next budget can then be done by a simple 51% majority which is the regular coalition. This dept brake change needed a 2/3 vote and lays the foundation for easier budgets in the future.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                English
                21 month ago

                Are you sure? From everything I read, there is only a 500 billion credit for infrastructure and an exception for defense spending above 1%.

                If the 500 billion credit is largely spent and/or designated by 2029, the next government may not be able to pass a budget without a lot of cuts. Especially because retirement spending will explode by then, taking away money from everything else.

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  2
                  edit-2
                  1 month ago

                  You are right, the off-budget fund (Sondervermögen) for infrastructure also needed a 2/3 vote. I was under the impression that the 500 billion credit and how it will be spend was just part of the negotiations for the dept brake reform. My bad.