• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    2
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    All of those needed to play ball with the church. Let me remind you of all that pope and counterpope business, all the religious wars in Europe, the Crusades, excommunications as power moves, the church as landouners, etc.

    Secular means separation of church and state. That didn’t exist in medieval Europe. Otherwise, the enlightenment wouldn’t have been necessary.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        21 month ago

        I think you’re confusing “secular” with “worldly”. Secular means that the church and the state are separated. Or that the state is neutral regarding religion. That definetly wasn’t the case in medieval Europe. That’s part of why the US/French revolution happened.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            11 month ago

            From Wikipedia:

            Secularity, also the secular or secularness (from Latin saeculum, ‘worldly’ or ‘of a generation’), is the state of being unrelated or neutral in regards to religion.

            So, while you might be technically correct as it comes to what the literal translation is: that’s not how it’s used in political discourse.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              2
              edit-2
              1 month ago

              Are you unable to accept being wrong?

              This is exactly how it is and was used when talking about middle ages. There were secular and religious power, secular and religious courts, and in religious courts church only held authority in spiritual and religous matters. Exceptions to these rules are prince-bishops in HRE and other such examples (papal states) where bishops or pope were civil rulers of secular prinicpalities/states.