Florencia (she/her) to [email protected]English • 3 months agoPeople say they prefer stories written by humans over AI-generated works, yet new study suggests that’s not quite truetheconversation.comexternal-linkmessage-square22fedilinkarrow-up121
arrow-up121external-linkPeople say they prefer stories written by humans over AI-generated works, yet new study suggests that’s not quite truetheconversation.comFlorencia (she/her) to [email protected]English • 3 months agomessage-square22fedilink
minus-squaresnooggumslinkfedilinkEnglish5•edit-23 months agoSome human stories are plagiarized. Most human stories are similar to other stories without being plagiarized. ALL AI stories are plagiarized.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish8•3 months agoOh, so there are authors that never read a story before and just made it up in their heads? There is no real difference between AI and humans in respect to borrowing elements from other stories. AI stories may be lacking in some respects, but you can’t tell me human stories don’t recycle the same tropes
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish5•3 months ago There is no real difference between AI and humans in respect to borrowing elements from other stories. I say this is a case of reductivism
Human stories are also plagiarized
Some human stories are plagiarized.
Most human stories are similar to other stories without being plagiarized.
ALL AI stories are plagiarized.
Oh, so there are authors that never read a story before and just made it up in their heads?
There is no real difference between AI and humans in respect to borrowing elements from other stories.
AI stories may be lacking in some respects, but you can’t tell me human stories don’t recycle the same tropes
I say this is a case of reductivism
Giving Shakespeare ye olde side eye