• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    922 days ago

    Shooting the messenger is not strategically sound.

    She’s not the messenger. She is the speaker. Here, she is attempting to exert her own brand of political influence.

    Her political influence is largely responsible for the sorry state of the Democratic party today.

    Whatever message needs to be sent, someone else can send it.

    • Pete HahnloserOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      322 days ago

      If you think Hillary Clinton is “largely responsible” for the state of the Democratic Party, you’ve not been paying attention. It’s not as though they were populist just up until 2016.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        722 days ago

        She has been a major player in the party since the 90s. She is, indeed, largely responsible for the current state of the party.

        • Pete HahnloserOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          122 days ago

          Yes, she obviously was a major player. But she didn’t engineer the rightward lurch as you claim. Again, I don’t much care for her, but the GOP talking points for decades as though she was somehow the one pulling the strings was effective.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            022 days ago

            Again, I don’t much care for her,

            Who do you care for? Let’s spend a little more time on people who actually matter.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                English
                2
                edit-2
                22 days ago

                Yeah?

                Check out the rest of the comments in this thread. Getting a lot of insightful and innovative policy discourse from your post?

                If you care about policy, you’ll avoid any mention of that person in the future. As soon as her name is mentioned, the policy conversation ends.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                1
                edit-2
                21 days ago

                There is no such thing.

                The person is the one who pursues, builds, and implements policy. A bad person will not be a good ally, no matter their professed policy beliefs, because it is only integrity that binds a politician to work for their constituents once elected.

                Without a good person, you have no way to trust that good policy will follow.