@[email protected]M to Science [email protected]English • 1 month agoomglemmy.dbzer0.comimagemessage-square36fedilinkarrow-up1445
arrow-up1445imageomglemmy.dbzer0.com@[email protected]M to Science [email protected]English • 1 month agomessage-square36fedilink
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish51•1 month agoWhat if I told you that it works for any number 𝑥 you replace 2 with? (Except for 0 but still working for 𝐥𝐢𝐦 𝑥→0)
minus-squaresp3ctr4llinkfedilinkEnglish15•1 month ago… where x is positive. Otherwise it has an imaginary component and is complex.
What if I told you that it works for any number 𝑥 you replace 2 with? (Except for 0 but still working for 𝐥𝐢𝐦 𝑥→0)
… where x is positive.
Otherwise it has an imaginary component and is complex.
Nope, it still works even then.
NOW I get it. Thanks.