double edit: interestingly, your entire line of discussion helps achieve the exact division you are proposing is the goal of the propagandists you insist are operating here.
you are making a positive claim (propagandists are prevalent on Lemmy), but you have no proof. while, of course, an absence of evidence is not evidence of absence, what you are doing achieves the exact thing younclaim the propagandists want: creating division in our communities.
this is speculative
edit: and non-falsifiable
double edit: interestingly, your entire line of discussion helps achieve the exact division you are proposing is the goal of the propagandists you insist are operating here.
Which part is speculative?
You are trying to derive proof from “lack of proof”, with which I unfortunately can’t help, Senator McCarthy.
What are you trying to signal by denying my claim that there are bots and trolls among the comments?
you are making a positive claim (propagandists are prevalent on Lemmy), but you have no proof. while, of course, an absence of evidence is not evidence of absence, what you are doing achieves the exact thing younclaim the propagandists want: creating division in our communities.
the origin and intent of the comments you don’t like.
there is some high irony here, considering who is stirring up a witch hunt.