alphacyberranger to [email protected]English • 1 month agoAverage LinkedIn usersh.itjust.worksimagemessage-square48fedilinkarrow-up1481
arrow-up1481imageAverage LinkedIn usersh.itjust.worksalphacyberranger to [email protected]English • 1 month agomessage-square48fedilink
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink11•edit-21 month agoHow the fuck does that graph even works?! Shows the very left of the graph, then says you’re in the top? Doesn’t make any sense. Edit : clearly I belong in the top 85% too. I guess I confused % and percentile!
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink10•1 month ago85% of people have that IQ or higher. Maybe they do it this way so those that don’t get it don’t feel sad about the results?
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink4•1 month agoi hate how IQ tests use both percentages and percentiles for the results
minus-squaremy_hat_stinkslinkfedilink13•1 month agoIt says top 85%. In a room with 100 people the 85th smartest person would be in the top 85% but they’d also be in the bottom 15%.
How the fuck does that graph even works?! Shows the very left of the graph, then says you’re in the top? Doesn’t make any sense. Edit : clearly I belong in the top 85% too. I guess I confused % and percentile!
I am going to believe this is comedy gold.
85% of people have that IQ or higher. Maybe they do it this way so those that don’t get it don’t feel sad about the results?
i hate how IQ tests use both percentages and percentiles for the results
I just realised that was my mistake yeah -_-;
It says top 85%. In a room with 100 people the 85th smartest person would be in the top 85% but they’d also be in the bottom 15%.
Top 85% could mean bottom 15% (±1%)