@[email protected]M to Science [email protected]English • 1 month agoshrimp colour dramamander.xyzimagemessage-square147fedilinkarrow-up12.02K
arrow-up12.02Kimageshrimp colour dramamander.xyz@[email protected]M to Science [email protected]English • 1 month agomessage-square147fedilink
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish5•1 month agoPink isn’t real. There is no wavelength of light that is pink.
minus-squareBilb!linkfedilinkEnglish6•1 month agoIts bright red, maybe toward purple! Brown is dark orange.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish6•1 month agoLight frequencies between blue and red don’t exist.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish1•1 month agoFor pink light to be perceived, it needs red cones to fully react, and both green and blue cones to only partially activate. https://gizmodo.com/if-the-color-pink-doesnt-scientifically-exist-why-can-1464266788
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish1•1 month agoWavelength of green light = 550nm Wavelength of pink light = N/A
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish1•1 month agoThere is no disagreement. Merriam/Websters definition of color is not scientific. Science says pink light doesn’t exist.
Pink isn’t real. There is no wavelength of light that is pink.
Its bright red, maybe toward purple! Brown is dark orange.
This person colors
Light frequencies between blue and red don’t exist.
deleted by creator
For pink light to be perceived, it needs red cones to fully react, and both green and blue cones to only partially activate.
https://gizmodo.com/if-the-color-pink-doesnt-scientifically-exist-why-can-1464266788
deleted by creator
Wavelength of green light = 550nm
Wavelength of pink light = N/A
deleted by creator
There is no disagreement. Merriam/Websters definition of color is not scientific. Science says pink light doesn’t exist.
Clearly, it’s light-ish red.