• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    11 month ago

    Shouldn’t’t need it. Instead I say the push should be that any AI trained on public resources must remain public and any derivative of that model also must remain publicly available.

    • Echo Dot
      link
      fedilink
      English
      51 month ago

      Yes I agree. But copyrighted material isn’t a public resource.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        1
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        I don’t care about copyrights. I care about content.

        Every paid artist could disappear. Content will still be created. Probably better content and products then anything created under any copyright and IP as is now.

        • Echo Dot
          link
          fedilink
          English
          21 month ago

          If we didn’t have copyright then people wouldn’t be able to justify putting effort into creating content because they wouldn’t be guaranteed financial compensation for the time and effort they put in.

          Everything costs money, If I’m writing a novel I still have to pay the bills I still have to buy groceries I still have to pay for water and electricity I need to be compensated for my time.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            11 month ago

            I have needs and wants as well. I hope you get paid well. But when you stand in the path of something I think to be progress then we conflict.

            • Echo Dot
              link
              fedilink
              English
              1
              edit-2
              1 month ago

              I’m not standing in your path of success, fiscal reality is. If you want your utopia future by all means, but you need to actually come up with a solution.

              Making naive comments online isn’t a stance, it’s just declaring to the world you don’t know what you’re talking about.