• @[email protected]OP
    link
    fedilink
    52 months ago

    They’re literally trying to specify “non-consecutive”. Barack already had his two terms do is not eligible.

    They’re just throwing shit at the wall at this point.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      22 months ago

      Oh. I thought since his third wouldn’t be consecutive with his first two, it’d be legal. I guess it depends on how they define consecutive.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        12 months ago

        You don’t include future possibilities in requirements to get to that future possibility.

        “Hasn’t already served two consecutive terms” doesn’t care if the third would be non-consecutive.