@[email protected] to politics @lemmy.world • 19 days agoContempt as Trump claims he can run for third term: ‘This is what dictators do’www.theguardian.comexternal-linkmessage-square76fedilinkarrow-up1610
arrow-up1610external-linkContempt as Trump claims he can run for third term: ‘This is what dictators do’www.theguardian.com@[email protected] to politics @lemmy.world • 19 days agomessage-square76fedilink
minus-square@[email protected]OPlinkfedilink5•18 days agoThey’re literally trying to specify “non-consecutive”. Barack already had his two terms do is not eligible. They’re just throwing shit at the wall at this point.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish2•18 days agoOh. I thought since his third wouldn’t be consecutive with his first two, it’d be legal. I guess it depends on how they define consecutive.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink1•18 days agoYou don’t include future possibilities in requirements to get to that future possibility. “Hasn’t already served two consecutive terms” doesn’t care if the third would be non-consecutive.
They’re literally trying to specify “non-consecutive”. Barack already had his two terms do is not eligible.
They’re just throwing shit at the wall at this point.
Oh. I thought since his third wouldn’t be consecutive with his first two, it’d be legal. I guess it depends on how they define consecutive.
You don’t include future possibilities in requirements to get to that future possibility.
“Hasn’t already served two consecutive terms” doesn’t care if the third would be non-consecutive.