FundMECFS to Microblog [email protected]English • edit-219 days agoMove the Overton Windowlemmy.blahaj.zoneimagemessage-square240fedilinkarrow-up11.84K
arrow-up11.84KimageMove the Overton Windowlemmy.blahaj.zoneFundMECFS to Microblog [email protected]English • edit-219 days agomessage-square240fedilink
minus-squareNSRXNlinkfedilinkEnglish2•18 days agothe fact you need to search indicates you may not be qualified to be having this discussion.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish1•18 days agoYou get funnier and funnier. I literally lol’d that one.
minus-squareNSRXNlinkfedilinkEnglish2•18 days agoif you don’t know about the most successful third party in America that never won an election, you should probably not be the one teaching about third parties
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish1•18 days agoThis from the guy who needed ‘splitting the vote explained’ You just keep getting funnier and funnier. btw, uproarious laughter isn’t considered a sign of petulance. It means ‘sulky’
minus-squareNSRXNlinkfedilinkEnglish2•edit-218 days ago This from the guy who needed ‘splitting the vote explained’ just because you insisted on linking your favorite think tank doesn’t mean anyone needed to see it.
minus-squareNSRXNlinkfedilinkEnglish2•18 days agocorrecting your assumptions is generosity, not petulance
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish1•18 days agoSure, keep telling yourself whatever you need to. You’re a very smart person and a skilled debater; you have made a lot of people rethink their old ideas. You are talented and well-respected in your community. Need any more affirmations? After all the laughter you’ve given me, I feel like giving something back.
the fact you need to search indicates you may not be qualified to be having this discussion.
You get funnier and funnier. I literally lol’d that one.
if you don’t know about the most successful third party in America that never won an election, you should probably not be the one teaching about third parties
This from the guy who needed ‘splitting the vote explained’
You just keep getting funnier and funnier.
btw, uproarious laughter isn’t considered a sign of petulance. It means ‘sulky’
just because you insisted on linking your favorite think tank doesn’t mean anyone needed to see it.
Now who is acting petulant?
correcting your assumptions is generosity, not petulance
Sure, keep telling yourself whatever you need to.
You’re a very smart person and a skilled debater; you have made a lot of people rethink their old ideas.
You are talented and well-respected in your community.
Need any more affirmations?
After all the laughter you’ve given me, I feel like giving something back.