@[email protected] to Political [email protected]English • 25 days agosurelylemmy.blahaj.zoneimagemessage-square178fedilinkarrow-up1925
arrow-up1925imagesurelylemmy.blahaj.zone@[email protected] to Political [email protected]English • 25 days agomessage-square178fedilink
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish1•edit-224 days agoI’m saying human systems and the ideas surrounding them can’t be quantified by a single graph.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink2•24 days agoI didn’t say they could be. But graphs can be helpful in understanding certain aspects of those systems/ideas.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish1•edit-224 days agoI suppose my nitpick is that it simplifies things so much that it obfuscates what we’re actually discussing a lot of the time. It becomes an argument of this vs that instead of what do we have to do to achieve common shared goals.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink2•24 days agoI disagree, I think having a common frame of reference is useful in discussing opposing viewpoints.
I’m saying human systems and the ideas surrounding them can’t be quantified by a single graph.
I didn’t say they could be. But graphs can be helpful in understanding certain aspects of those systems/ideas.
I suppose my nitpick is that it simplifies things so much that it obfuscates what we’re actually discussing a lot of the time.
It becomes an argument of this vs that instead of what do we have to do to achieve common shared goals.
I disagree, I think having a common frame of reference is useful in discussing opposing viewpoints.