• NoneOfUrBusiness
    link
    fedilink
    6122 days ago

    Mexico is not South Sudan or Afghanistan, failed states ruled by warlords

    I’ll note that for the latter, it’s a failed state ruled by warlords because the US rolled in and fucked everything up.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        1022 days ago

        Arguably, Afghanistan has never been united as a nation in the way we think about it, at least not for long. The cycle seems to be short decades of control under some power followed by decades of decentralization and local powers.

      • NoneOfUrBusiness
        link
        fedilink
        722 days ago

        I mean it wasn’t exactly a shining example of progress and order, but it wasn’t a failed state.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      221 days ago

      No, it’s a failed state because the cartels have more power than the government. Stop blaming your own country, traitor.

      • NoneOfUrBusiness
        link
        fedilink
        1422 days ago

        Okay, and? Like them or hate them (jk you should hate them) but they had a state; it wasn’t “a failed state ruled by warlords”.

          • NoneOfUrBusiness
            link
            fedilink
            1522 days ago

            No it’s not? A failed state is one in which the state can’t punish a significant amount of non-state sanctioned violence, which wasn’t the case in Afghanistan.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              422 days ago

              I suppose if you use that definition then when America invaded it became a failed state run by warlords and now it has recovered.

              • NoneOfUrBusiness
                link
                fedilink
                722 days ago

                Yeah exactly. Now, being a non-failed state, they can start the long, gruelling process of cultural and political evolution. That’s why you’re hearing about Afghani human rights activists now but not ten years ago.

      • NoneOfUrBusiness
        link
        fedilink
        522 days ago

        I mean given that the war on terror started in 2001, we don’t need to go back any further than 1980.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          722 days ago

          Well then, I guess it was perfect and stable prior to 2001, no need to investigate further!