There’s been a lot of speculation around what Threads will be and what it means for Mastodon. We’ve put together some of the most common questions and our responses based on what was launched today.

  • ch1cken
    link
    fedilink
    101 year ago

    Mastodon is 100% a competitor to #Meta

    They’re not competitors by any means, similar to how kbin is not a competitor to lemmy. Threads, kbin, mastodon, lemmy, and all other fediverse (activitypub) services go hand in hand, they all benefit eachother.

    • mycelium_underground
      link
      fedilink
      161 year ago

      if you believe meta is going to act in the best interest of the fediverse, and not try to fuck it over, then please kindly remove your head from your ass.

      • StableStackOfBricks
        link
        fedilink
        51 year ago

        I believe they may try, but I think the approach Mastodon is taking isn’t necessarily a warm embrace. They seem to be handling this with skepticism and I have read that they have plans to Defederate if Meta tries to exploit Activity Pub in any way.

      • ch1cken
        link
        fedilink
        31 year ago

        if you believe meta is going to act in the best interest of the fediverse, and not try to fuck it over, then please kindly remove your head from your ass.

        lol, i can say the same back to you, if you think that instances de-federating from meta, de-federating from instances who haven’t de-federated from meta, dividing up content and users from eachother, won’t cause the fediverse to self implode, then you need to open your eyes.

        All of this started due to people’s mindset of “eww facebook bad”, the creator of mastodon doesn’t think its an issue and is optimistic of the change, yet people still are refusing to change their mindset, i even saw someone bring up conspiracy that the mastodon founder got bribed by meta… which is absolutely ridiculous.

        If things continue as is, with mass de-federation, you are going to kill the fediverse without realising. If you dislike meta, thats understandable, just de-federate client side, but if an instance owner makes that choice for all users, that would be censorship, something the fediverse aims to avoid. We all shit on meta/twitter/other large corps for censoring content, but when instance owner’s do it, its fine? De-federating for ideological reasons like this goes against the principles of federation.

      • HeartyBeast
        link
        fedilink
        21 year ago

        Meta will act in Meta’s best interest. We don’t know yet whether that will be be beneficial or damaging to the Fediverse. It could be beneficial in terms of user numbers and general adoption. If they are arses then sure - defederate

    • BedSharkPal
      link
      fedilink
      1
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      I see no way they aren’t a competitor. Meta is a company. Companies exists to make money. Meta makes money by driving engagement and then monitizing via ads or user data sale for others to target ads.

      Like are we all supposed to pretend a company, Meta of all companies, is an altruistic entity? Because that’s not how it works… At all.

      Remove corporations from social networks.

      • ch1cken
        link
        fedilink
        21 year ago

        Meta makes money by driving engagement and then monitizing via ads or user data sale for others to target ads.

        Then don’t use the official instance, ads or tracking won’t affect you if you’re using threads from a kbin instance for e.g.

        Remove corporations from social networks.

        i don’t think that’s fair, not all corporations are evil, besides non-profits exist like signal/mozilla.

        • BedSharkPal
          link
          fedilink
          11 year ago

          It’s poisoning the well though, even if I don’t see the ads. Also they will prioritize inflammatory content to drive engagement, which would affect other instances as well (you know, like they do for all their other apps/platforms).

          And corporations are not good or bad, but the for profit ones… are for profit. And I’m sorry but there is no justification for a profit motive in social media.

    • Kichae
      link
      fedilink
      11 year ago

      Meta is different. The others aren’t in competition with each other, but for-profit business is in competition by definition.

    • Ragnell
      link
      fedilink
      11 year ago

      This is true with Kbin and Lemmy, and Mastodon instances but Meta doesn’t have that mindset. They are going to have ads and are going to see users not on their instance as eyes that rightfully belong to them that are not set on those ads.

      • ch1cken
        link
        fedilink
        21 year ago

        They are going to have ads

        And? If people decide to use their instance, they’re likely fine with seeing ads or being tracked, that’s their choice. For those who aren’t ok with that, myself included, don’t have to use the official instance. I don’t see what’s wrong with that.

        • Ragnell
          link
          fedilink
          21 year ago

          Again, from the user POV, yes, that is fine. From Meta POV, it’s incentive to try and lock as many eyes in as possible using tactics that we probably won’t think of because we aren’t able to think from the POV of being pure scum.