• @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      4
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      The UK has one of the highest numbers of surveillance cameras per person, this is just a fact of life that people are used to. The ULEZ cameras are typically ANPR (Automatic Number Plate Recognition), the government already know what cars you own and how polluting they are. You can’t deny that these low emission zones are decreasing air pollution and London needs it. The attacks on the cameras are because they are adding surveillance but because it is £12.50p per day if your car does not meet standards so is an added “tax” for living in London which is being forced on the local councils with little thought for the individual circumstance.

      There is a Channel 4 show a while ago called Hunted which mimics the levels of surveillance the police have to track contestants down, it is both scary and interesting how much they can work out and track down.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        52 years ago

        It’s not a tax, you can easily avoid paying it by just getting a compliant car, can’t get out of taxes so easily.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          22 years ago

          True, tax is probably not the best word hence the “”, fine is better, or just charge.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      72 years ago

      How else do you propose to run the ULEZ system bar toll booths all over London to pay at as you drive?

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          62 years ago

          Exactly, numberplate cameras are the best bet to manage this.

          The people pulling them down aren’t making some brave stand against surveillance, they’re just arseholes annoyed they’re now facing some consequences for the damage their out of date vehicles cause to other people.