@[email protected] to [email protected]English • 2 months agoPython Performance: Why 'if not list' is 2x Faster Than Using len()blog.codingconfessions.comexternal-linkmessage-square150fedilinkarrow-up1223cross-posted to: [email protected]
arrow-up1223external-linkPython Performance: Why 'if not list' is 2x Faster Than Using len()blog.codingconfessions.com@[email protected] to [email protected]English • 2 months agomessage-square150fedilinkcross-posted to: [email protected]
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish5•2 months agoThat woulb be 0.5x. −2x implies negative duration, which makes no sense. Neither does the layout of anything else in the image.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish2•edit-22 months agoI think it was supposed to be a ~, since they use that in a paragraph below the image.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish2•2 months agoIt probably is AI. Either that, or a drunken stupor that produced that graph.
Isn’t “-2x faster” 2x slower?
That woulb be 0.5x. −2x implies negative duration, which makes no sense. Neither does the layout of anything else in the image.
Maybe they mean up to?
I think it was supposed to be a
~, since they use that in a paragraph below the image.Blame AI
It probably is AI. Either that, or a drunken stupor that produced that graph.