• @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      2516 days ago

      The previous dismissals of court orders were injunctions, not rulings. That’s a contempt of court charge, not a constitutional crisis.

      Today were both the first and second rulings he has openly defied. The first was refusing to return Garcia. The second was refusing to allow the AP into the Oval Office to cover the press conference.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        515 days ago

        Right, so NOW we’ll see how things are, or are not, going to work. Next, the military is up. They would need to remove him from office and let new elections run. If not, then it’s up to us, the last line of defense.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          2016 days ago

          Like the French Revolution, it takes a lot for a revolt. Ultimately if faces aren’t seen, it forgotten. As for republicans, if they aren’t white faces; it’s forgotten in a day or two.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          1716 days ago

          Lots of us are peacefully protesting and it’s pretty hard for most of us to do anything more than that

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            3
            edit-2
            16 days ago

            Well you guys gotta make an effort or you’ll find out first hand the difference between e.g. Ukraine and Russia. Or Taiwan and China

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              515 days ago

              Americans have to take on the largest military in the world. Are you selling war planes that you can get to Florida without issue?

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                615 days ago

                “americans” aren’t a regular army, they’re a dispersed civilian population and the us military historically actually has a lot of trouble with those

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  114 days ago

                  And the us military historically actually has a lot of trouble with those

                  I disagree, not anymore anyway. Sure Vietnam was a wholesale loss. But while the US failed to institute a lasting democracy in Afghanistan, their KD is like 1:200. In 20 years of occupation they lost under 3000 troops. That is with logistics supplying the force on the other side of the world. That’s actually a crazy accomplishment and show of power.

                  While the military might not be able to “win” if they fully side with trump, America in for a long and bloody (mostly bloody for the civilians) occupation.

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  515 days ago

                  Absolutely. So, your solution is normal Americans declare war and wage irregular asymmetric warfare today. Against what? Our local government buildings? The post office? Commit sabotage against what exactly?

                  • @[email protected]
                    link
                    fedilink
                    415 days ago

                    We are going to find out if we prefer the consequences of revolt or the consequences of not revolting more.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        716 days ago

        Tariffs have doubled the cost of red-lines, as they were sourced in S. E. Asia, processed in a small barely-know penguin island, and packaged in Denmark.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      916 days ago

      No, this is probably the first one.

      The previous one where they disobeyed a court order (turning around planes to El Salvador, stopping new planes from taking off) they successfully appealed that court order to where the Supreme Court declared that order void.

      This one (facilitate the return of a wrongfully deported man) is the first one where they’ve just outright refused, and are pretending they can’t comply.

      This is a big deal, and it’s unprecedented, even for Trump. This is the red line, and we’re going to see a full blown constitutional crisis this week if it doesn’t get resolved.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        316 days ago

        I agree in the sense that the way things played out the narrative can be he was right the whole time, so someone inclined to avoid conflict can excuse it, but even if you’re right, you’re still obligated to follow court orders until you successfully get it stayed or appealed. They got a lawful order from a court to turn around flights and just didn’t. The order doesn’t need to be at the end of an appeal to the Supreme Court before it has effect.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          415 days ago

          They got a lawful order from a court to turn around flights and just didn’t. The order doesn’t need to be at the end of an appeal to the Supreme Court before it has effect.

          I know. That was on a collision course for a constitutional crisis then, and then the Supreme Court bailed out Trump by saying the order was invalid, right before the judge was going to hold contempt hearings.

          Now we’re gonna see possible contempt hearings on disobeying an order that was affirmed by the Supreme Court.

    • HubertManne
      link
      fedilink
      English
      516 days ago

      yeah its like a goalpost redline. Whelp its not really facism until he does x, oh well we are fine unless he gets away with y…