• Jerkface (any/all)
    link
    fedilink
    English
    4
    edit-2
    12 days ago

    As though Canada doesn’t have anything as remote as Alaska… People living in Labrador or Churchill have exactly the same needs.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      212 days ago

      And many of those people hate Canada’s gun laws. The guy i work with from kapuskasing would gladly have Canada become the 51st state if it meant he could have more guns.

      • Jerkface (any/all)
        link
        fedilink
        English
        512 days ago

        So? It demonstrates that, contrary to your assertion that people depend on American gun laws, it is perfectly possible to exist in these situations with Canada’s gun laws. I get that people have an emotional dependency on guns, but that’s not an actual necessity.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          212 days ago

          All I claimed was that alaskans would have a hard time giving up their guns to join Canada. I never claimed it was impossible to live rurally without a gun.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              112 days ago

              Canada had significantly different gun laws and most of their current guns or accessories may be illegal depending on magazine capacity, barrel length, or specific model.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                112 days ago

                Fair, but that’s an easy fix. Like a shotgun holds 5 shells but in Canada you can only have 3 in it, so you load a plug. Change your magazine. Etc. Doesn’t mean you give up everything, and on the flip side you get healthcare