• zout
      link
      fedilink
      2217 days ago

      I am indeed, because the one with the capital R is more fringe to me, and there is no context pointing to that one.

      • db0OP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        917 days ago

        The context is that the meme is making fun of it, which makes no sense for the epistemological version.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          917 days ago

          The further context is that you posted this in the Philosophy community, which draws my mind more toward historical thinkers than modern groups that use “rational” to sound smart.

          • db0OP
            link
            fedilink
            English
            617 days ago

            plenty of modern philosophers. If you think philosophy is only about historical old men, that’s on you.

              • db0OP
                link
                fedilink
                English
                6
                edit-2
                17 days ago

                I can excuse the confusion, but I don’t get why people are defensive about it. is their self-worth tied to how well they identify philosophy schools?

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              217 days ago

              Yeah, I had a few modern philosophers as professors in college when I minored in it. Based on a glimpse at the wikipedia article you shared, I’m hesitant to call these modern rationalists philosophers. Sophists sounds more appropriate.

              I just thought there was some additional context that you missed which would explain the confusion some people are having. I will easily admit that it is my fault for thinking of historic philosophers whose ideas are still discussed today before a fringe group from Silicon Valley that uses the same terminology.