• lemmyng
    link
    fedilink
    English
    816 days ago

    NAL, but as it was explained to me by a lawyer: Part of a patent remaining valid is demonstrating that they put consistent effort into enforcing it. Nintendo not having filed suit against the other companies (if the games are indeed found to be violating the same patent) lays groundwork for invalidation. This is for example the reason Pepsico sued farmers in India for cultivating their patented potato - not because it would harm their business, but because it would harm the validity of their patent if they didn’t.

      • lemmyng
        link
        fedilink
        English
        815 days ago

        Yeah, and it sucks that plants can be patented. Monsanto in particular can go die in a fire.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          615 days ago

          I like the idea of GMOs, being able to engineer plants to survive in harsher conditions and have a greater yield. I do agree with you about the patenting though. Something that benefits man shouldn’t be gatekeeped.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            515 days ago

            I like the idea of GMOs, being able to engineer plants to survive in harsher conditions and have a greater yield.

            Unfortunately, they also like to engineer them to not produce viable seed. Roundup Ready canola/rapeseed can only be reseeded once, if I remember correctly, forcing farmers to purchase more seed to keep farming. And if there’s cross-pollination in a neighbouring farm, Monsanto likes to sue the neighbour for illegally planting their crops, despite it being the result of plants doing plant stuff.

    • Melmi
      link
      fedilink
      English
      815 days ago

      How is that relevant when this patents are new, just backdated, and clearly filed primarily for this lawsuit?