• @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        35 days ago

        Did you not read the article? They’re facing contempt of court charges and have until the 23rd to support their defense. If the DoJ refuses to enforce the charges, the judge said he’ll appoint an attorney to do so.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          55 days ago

          I read the article. I’ve also seen what’s happened so far when judges have sanctioned or ruled against Trump … and nothing happens.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            35 days ago

            No members of his administration have been charged yet. Courts are slow. They ordered injunctions, which were defied. The judges didn’t hold them in contempt to prevent evidence of bias prior to a ruling. As of yesterday, they have defied rulings. Today, they set the contempt of court charge in motion. This is how the courts work.

            • bthest
              link
              fedilink
              English
              25 days ago

              Been hearing this shit for years. The Ukraine call, stealing classified documents, the election interference, the insurrection. When they finally got a conviction the judge wasn’t even allowed to punish Trump.

              So this is time they’re serious? Yeah I’ll believe it when I see it.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                25 days ago

                This is very different. These are the active checks and balances of our government, not a criminal case against a former president. This is necessary for our government to function.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      25 days ago

      The legislative branch isn’t the courts.

      The legislative branch has been confirming all of the appointments.

      The legislative branch could try impeaching him (again) but we both know that’s not going to happen. Best case scenario is yet another vote down party lines. The magats are complicit. The corporatists are complicit. There are scant few voices that speak up for anything that doesn’t benefit themselves.

      The majority are letting all of this happen.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          55 days ago

          Gotcha, that makes more sense.

          So then to answer your question, the judiciary branch is being de-fanged. They’re supposed to be a safeguard against all of this. But it’s all just words on paper if nothing is enforced. Agent Orange was handled with kid gloves the past four years. Cases delayed, investigations slow-walked, and even the cases that ended in conviction saw zero consequences.

          If judicial (those that aren’t full owned, anyway) wants to try and reverse course… I wish them luck. I would love to be wrong about this pessimism. But given that a third of the public blindly believes whatever Fox etc tell them (and another ~third, probably more, can’t be bothered to pay attention), it all plays straight into the persecution narrative. They are grossly outnumbered, outfinanced, and outgunned.

          This is why we are seeing the phrase “constitutional crisis” bandied about. The groundwork has been laid over generations. The plans are being executed now.

          “You’re not allowed to do that” is not stopping any of it.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            55 days ago

            Just courts are slow, but they’re getting there. First the judge issued injunctions, and they defied them. Boasberg was right not to charge them with contempt prior to a ruling to prevent evidence of bias during the inevitable appeal. They defied the ruling yesterday, and Boasberg immediately began the case for contempt today. They have until the 23rd to substantiate their defense. Boasberg has already stated that he will appoint an attorney if the DoJ refuses to do their job. The only way they’re getting out of this is with pardons, which is an outright admission of guilt.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              45 days ago

              The problem with rules is that they bind those that follow them and enable those that disregard them. I’m not against those trying to enforce the rules. I’m just hyper-aware of the damage being done in the meantime.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                35 days ago

                We all are. The problem is we have no hope other than the courts succeeding. Projecting defeatism while they’re actively doing their job is unnecessarily discouraging to most. There are still more steps that can be taken to stop this.