@[email protected] to Microblog [email protected]English • 16 days agotax the richlemmy.blahaj.zoneimagemessage-square99fedilinkarrow-up11.48K
arrow-up11.48Kimagetax the richlemmy.blahaj.zone@[email protected] to Microblog [email protected]English • 16 days agomessage-square99fedilink
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish1•15 days agoif there was a maximum income people would still bitch and whine about those with mansions aquired through non monetary means.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish5•15 days agoPerhaps the next step is to improve our land use policy, such that one individual isn’t afforded a mansion’s worth of real estate.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish1•15 days agoa farm uses more land than most small mansions though, and plenty of individuals own farms.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish3•15 days agoNot as many as you would think, actually. And that is not the same thing that is being talked about.
if there was a maximum income people would still bitch and whine about those with mansions aquired through non monetary means.
Perhaps the next step is to improve our land use policy, such that one individual isn’t afforded a mansion’s worth of real estate.
a farm uses more land than most small mansions though, and plenty of individuals own farms.
Not as many as you would think, actually. And that is not the same thing that is being talked about.
Farm collectivization isn’t a new idea