The ADAM contraceptive is a hydrogel injected into the male sperm ducts to block the passage of sperm, and it seems to still be effective two years into the first human clinical trial.
Buddy, Vasagel was announced in 2011 and has since not released anything to market. It’s been literal decades with nothing on RISUG actually being viable.
One company failed to bring an announced product to market, must be discrimination! The lack of results is proof that they’re not trying to solve the problem! Investors are committing capital in 3 different companies to fake interest in the idea in order to continue to oppress women!
Neglect of research into women’s healthcare is real, we don’t need to invent bogeymen where there isn’t one.
What? The guy I replied to said “oh where are the products on market, I guess oppressing women is too important”. That was literally the point of my comment was how absurdist of a take that was for the same reason you just said.
Buddy they’re in human trials with the FDA to bring a male pill to the market, and this startup is selling an injection. Idk what you’re on about.
Buddy, Vasagel was announced in 2011 and has since not released anything to market. It’s been literal decades with nothing on RISUG actually being viable.
One company failed to bring an announced product to market, must be discrimination! The lack of results is proof that they’re not trying to solve the problem! Investors are committing capital in 3 different companies to fake interest in the idea in order to continue to oppress women!
Neglect of research into women’s healthcare is real, we don’t need to invent bogeymen where there isn’t one.
Okay, apparently in your world simply pointing out that research was started over a decade ago with no tangible results is oppressing women.
Well good luck with your leaps in logic they and your persecution complex.
What? The guy I replied to said “oh where are the products on market, I guess oppressing women is too important”. That was literally the point of my comment was how absurdist of a take that was for the same reason you just said.
I think we’re simply typing past each other then. My bad.
Am I missing something here??? You just restated my original point to me as though we’re disagreeing with each other.