@[email protected] to [email protected]English • 3 months agoIt scares a grown manlemm.eeimagemessage-square24fedilinkarrow-up1143
arrow-up1143imageIt scares a grown manlemm.ee@[email protected] to [email protected]English • 3 months agomessage-square24fedilink
minus-squareCount Regal Inkwelllinkfedilink22•3 months agocfdisk is fine Masochists use regular fdisk. No curses tui, just a command line designed in the seventies with engineers in mind.
minus-squareCount Regal Inkwelllinkfedilink2•3 months agoHey it’s okay, some of us get our masochism kick from butt-stuff. Some of us get it from using tools from the 70s.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish2•3 months agoMicrosoft replaced fdisk with diskpart.exe in Windows 2000. I can’t imagine how bad the former must have been to warrant that switch. (Or was it super-early enshittification?)
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink7•3 months agoI prefer fdisk. Idk, the sort of linear nature and simplicity appeals to me. As opposed to a tui with more going on.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink4•3 months agoI wasn’t even aware cfdisk existed. I’ve been using fdisk since the 90s. It works fine.
cfdisk is fine
Masochists use regular fdisk. No curses tui, just a command line designed in the seventies with engineers in mind.
Today I learned I’m a masochist
Hey it’s okay, some of us get our masochism kick from butt-stuff. Some of us get it from using tools from the 70s.
Microsoft replaced fdisk with diskpart.exe in Windows 2000. I can’t imagine how bad the former must have been to warrant that switch. (Or was it super-early enshittification?)
I prefer fdisk. Idk, the sort of linear nature and simplicity appeals to me. As opposed to a tui with more going on.
I wasn’t even aware cfdisk existed. I’ve been using fdisk since the 90s. It works fine.