It is impossible to defend democratic rights or any of the social interests of working people without seizing the unearned wealth of the billionaire parasites.
Bollocks, billionaire propaganda. Less that 3,000 people collectively control more than 90% of the World’s wealth. It doesn’t pale in comparison to anything. You’re just a bootlicker, or contrarian, makes no difference. You’re still wrong.
What am I wrong about? You think the equity held by private honeowners is worth more than an infinite line of credit from JP Morgan and Chase Bank? You’re a moron.
You responded to what they quoted, not why they quoted it. The quoter does not agree with the quote; they presented it as evidence of the original commentor’s malfeasance.
Your response is appropriate against the person who made the original comment, not the person who quoted it.
No one mentioned regular home owners. Why are you making devisive comments not related to any point that were made?
Yes they did.
You’ll notice it wasn’t me though, so why am I being asked what somebody I’m actively disagreeing with means by “regular homeowners”?
Bollocks, billionaire propaganda. Less that 3,000 people collectively control more than 90% of the World’s wealth. It doesn’t pale in comparison to anything. You’re just a bootlicker, or contrarian, makes no difference. You’re still wrong.
Reading comprehension is not your strong suit. Practice more.
What am I wrong about? You think the equity held by private honeowners is worth more than an infinite line of credit from JP Morgan and Chase Bank? You’re a moron.
There’s that pesky reading comprehension again.
No one but the TLC was supporting corporate ownership of residential property.
You responded to what they quoted, not why they quoted it. The quoter does not agree with the quote; they presented it as evidence of the original commentor’s malfeasance.
Your response is appropriate against the person who made the original comment, not the person who quoted it.
What the actual fuck are you talking about?