"no" banana to Lemmy [email protected] • 7 days agoChoose a number, 1-5!lemmy.worldimagemessage-square441fedilinkarrow-up1542
arrow-up1542imageChoose a number, 1-5!lemmy.world"no" banana to Lemmy [email protected] • 7 days agomessage-square441fedilink
minus-squareUriel238 [all pronouns]linkfedilink35•7 days ago2, assuming the broad pommel is a counterweight. If it’s flimsy lightweight material then none of them.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish3•7 days agoAll of this is exactly right. #2 is the least cringe-inducing because of the lumpy bottom. Is this fork thing an official diagnosis metric? Or just not yet?
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink3•edit-27 days ago2 has the best tines but that huge duckbill handle is a non-starter. 5 has the best handle
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish3•7 days agoFive is out because its outer tines are curved. There is no reason for that and that is why I hate it. One, however, is the best. I find it eat slower (and often less) if my silverware isn’t the size of a pitchfork.
2, assuming the broad pommel is a counterweight. If it’s flimsy lightweight material then none of them.
Getting aboard the #2 train
All of this is exactly right. #2 is the least cringe-inducing because of the lumpy bottom.
Is this fork thing an official diagnosis metric? Or just not yet?
2 has the best tines but that huge duckbill handle is a non-starter. 5 has the best handle
deleted by creator
Five is out because its outer tines are curved. There is no reason for that and that is why I hate it.
One, however, is the best. I find it eat slower (and often less) if my silverware isn’t the size of a pitchfork.
Yeah, longest tines wins.