That’s

  • 2 positive cards from the Greens, plus 2 positive pamphlets
  • 1 letter from the Greens, masquerading as a letter from a local concerned citizen with a mix of positive and negative
  • 2 positive cards from the LNP
  • 4 negative cards from the LNP, 3 targeting Labor, 1 targeting Labor and the Greens, plus 1 negative pamphlet targeting the Greens
  • 1 positive card from Labor, plus 1 positive pamphlet
  • 2 identical negative cards from LNP-aligned campaign group Advance Australia, targeting the Greens
  • @[email protected]English
    6•15 days ago

    The Greens should know better than spamming out mailboxes with unsolicited mail.

    Also using plastic single-use cable-ties to plaster plastic single-use corflutes to fences and road signs. It doesn’t seam very Environmentally conscious to me.

    I still hope they get more votes than the coalition though.

    • Gorgritch_Umie_Killa
      3•15 days ago

      You raise a good point, they could have an interesting point of distinction with their election materials as opposed the other parties. The difference in materials could be eye catching in itself.

      In saying that, i have noticed the Greens in my area have a higher rate of generic Greens Party corflutes, without the candidates, so thats something i suppose.

    • @[email protected]English
      2•15 days ago

      I despise the corflutes.

      I tried having a whinge to our local council about the ones that seemed to contravene the rules but they didn’t seem to care very much, and the law is quite permissive anyway.

      Sadly I think they provide candidates the best RoI. There must be a better way.

    • @[email protected]
      2•14 days ago

      Greens pamphlets are printing on recycled paper using biodegradable ink, and their corflutes are doubled sided with a different greens candidate, which eases waste.

      If you’re this concerned about environmental damage, I hope you’re vegan.