A family says their newborn son nearly bled to death and is fighting for his life after he was circumcised at a New York City hospital.

Tim and Gabrielle Groth said their son, Cole, underwent the circumcision at NewYork-Presbyterian Morgan Stanley Children’s Hospital in Manhattan, where he was born on March 31.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      620 days ago

      It depends on the day for me whether increased sensitivity would be a good or bad thing for me. But that’s mental illness and the accompanying drugs for ya.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        1420 days ago

        “It depends on the day whether more pleasure would be a good or bad thing for me”

        That’s a more precise version of your statement, I think.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          420 days ago

          Regardless, I’m circumcised, and if I was more sensitive in most situations, I wouldn’t last long enough for my wife’s toy to push her over the edge (I can get her off without it, but I’m too big and she’ll be sore for a week.

          Like, my prozac can be performance enhancing.

          • Bezier
            link
            fedilink
            1820 days ago

            The subset that wants it removed could still get that done later, right? Those who don’t aren’t given the option. Putting it back is a bit more difficult.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        7
        edit-2
        20 days ago

        Being intact is also preventative for some stds, iirc, but I couldn’t find anything to support that

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          920 days ago

          I looked into this claim a couple of years ago. I couldn’t find any well executed study that showed this. It’s mainly a talking point that people who argue for circumcision claim is true, but I couldn’t find any scientific support for this.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            420 days ago

            I was unclear. Circumcision predisposes you to STD transmission iirc, but I also couldn’t find anything.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              1320 days ago

              Because its the opposite actually. Circumcision reduces risk, inclusive of STIs as well as UTIs. Its a significant, but partial, reduction in risk. This has only been shown with PiV sexual activity and not with PiA sexual activity, which could be an important factor.

              https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8579597/

              Adult circumcision works out well, including for a family member who did it in his 30s due to severe phimosis (which is also linked to penile carcinoma).

              I think the only appropriate answer to circumcision is not at birth, only for a clear medical need until they are an adult, and at that point it’s their decision.

              But I doubt you’ll find anything peer reviewed that suggests an increase in STIs after circumcision, I’ve only ever seen the opposite, and I did a lot of reading on it before my son was born.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                820 days ago

                This is the correct way of looking at it. At birth should not be the time to do this… it should be done later in life, by the person’s own choosing.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          3
          edit-2
          20 days ago

          Largely beneficial for UTIs, which is the leading infection in young boys. UTIs in young children are often hard to diagnose before spreading to the kidneys

          Then later in life when getting too old to wash yourself the benefit returns again